Inventory
List AI systems, data flows and vendors.
Use AI without opening new security holes or compliance gaps. We assess AI risks, test LLM applications, put controls in place and help you prepare for regulation.
AI security, risk and compliance services identify and reduce the risks created by AI systems, such as data leakage, prompt injection, biased or wrong outputs, and regulatory exposure. ML Data House runs AI risk assessments, tests LLM applications against known attack patterns, implements technical controls and helps you document compliance.
Find every AI tool, model and vendor in use, including shadow AI.
Rate each AI system for privacy, security, accuracy, bias and legal risk.
Prompt injection, jailbreak, data-exfiltration and tool-abuse tests, informed by the OWASP Top 10 for LLM applications.
Input and output filtering, data masking, access control and logging.
DPIAs, model cards, risk registers and vendor assessments.
Alerts and reviews so risk stays under control as AI changes.
Short, visible steps with a demo or decision at the end of each one.
List AI systems, data flows and vendors.
Score risks and test key applications.
Implement controls and fix findings.
Document, monitor and review on a schedule.
One remote team, planned around the rules and working patterns of each market.
We work from our UK office in Wolverhampton with clients across England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, remotely. Projects are planned around UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018, ICO guidance on AI and data protection, and, if you sell into Europe, the EU AI Act.
For UK organizations we prepare DPIAs and follow ICO guidance on AI and data protection; for EU-facing services we map obligations under the EU AI Act.
We work remotely with US companies from coast to coast, and UK working hours overlap with the US East Coast morning for live calls and demos. We plan around the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, state privacy laws such as the CCPA/CPRA, and sector rules like HIPAA where they apply.
For US organizations we map risks to the NIST AI RMF, address state AI and privacy laws, and support SOC 2 and customer security questionnaires.
Leaking confidential data, prompt injection that hijacks an AI system, insecure tool access for agents, wrong or biased outputs, and unvetted third-party AI vendors.
Prompt injection is when text from a user, website or document tricks an AI model into ignoring its instructions, for example to reveal data or take an unwanted action. We test for it and add defences.
It can, if you place AI systems on the EU market or their outputs are used in the EU. We help you check whether and how it applies.
A voluntary US framework for managing AI risks, organised into four functions: Govern, Map, Measure and Manage. Many US organizations use it as their AI governance baseline.
No. We assess, test and improve AI systems and prepare documentation; formal certification is done by accredited bodies.
Approve safe AI tools, set an acceptable-use policy, apply data-loss controls and train staff. See AI workshops.
At least when a system changes materially and on a regular schedule, often quarterly for high-risk systems.
Tell us about your goals, data and systems. We will reply with practical next steps, wherever you are in the UK, the US or worldwide.